Jerami Grant vs Paul George
Grant · George
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJerami Grant scored more in 2025-26, 1.3 points a game apart (18.6 vs 17.3), on George's heavier usage (22.9% vs 22.8%).
Grant is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.8% to 57.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to George (3.6 vs 2.1 assists), the glass to George (5.3 vs 3.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Grant played 20 more games (57 vs 37 of 82).
With George on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.6 per 100 possessions, against -0.3 for Grant; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Grant $34.2M through 2027-28, George $54.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Grant | George | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-30 | Record when playing | 22-15 |
| 19.4 | Points at home | 16.3 |
| 17.9 | Points on the road | 18.4 |
| 19.3 | Points in wins | 18.7 |
| 18.0 | Points in losses | 15.3 |
| 35 | Season high | 39 |
| 4 | 30-point games | 3 |
| 0 | Double-doubles | 2 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).