Jerami Grant vs Scottie Barnes
Grant · Barnes
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJerami Grant scored more in 2025-26, 0.5 points a game apart (18.6 vs 18.1), on Grant's heavier usage (22.8% vs 22.6%).
Grant is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.8% to 57.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Barnes (5.9 vs 2.1 assists), the glass to Barnes (7.5 vs 3.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Barnes played 23 more games (80 vs 57 of 82).
With Barnes on the floor his team outscored opponents by +4.6 per 100 possessions, against -0.3 for Grant; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Grant $34.2M through 2027-28, Barnes $41.8M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Grant | Barnes | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-30 | Record when playing | 45-35 |
| 19.4 | Points at home | 18.8 |
| 17.9 | Points on the road | 17.3 |
| 19.3 | Points in wins | 19.1 |
| 18.0 | Points in losses | 16.8 |
| 35 | Season high | 33 |
| 4 | 30-point games | 4 |
| 0 | Double-doubles | 30 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).