Cam Spencer vs Daeqwon Plowden
Spencer · Plowden
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCam Spencer scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (11.1 vs 10.8), on Spencer's heavier usage (16.6% vs 15.7%).
Spencer is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 64.9% to 57.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Spencer (5.6 vs 1.3 assists), the glass to Plowden (3.0 vs 2.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Spencer played 40 more games (72 vs 32 of 82).
With Spencer on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.6 per 100 possessions, against -10.9 for Plowden; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Spencer $2.4M through 2028-29, Plowden $2.4M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
