Cedric Coward vs Quentin Grimes
Coward · Grimes
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCedric Coward scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (13.6 vs 13.4), on Coward's heavier usage (20.7% vs 18.3%).
Efficiency is a wash: true shooting within a point of each other (58.5% vs 58.5%).
Playmaking goes to Grimes (3.3 vs 2.8 assists), the glass to Coward (5.9 vs 3.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Grimes played 13 more games (75 vs 62 of 82).
With Coward on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.3 per 100 possessions, against -0.1 for Grimes; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Coward $6.0M through 2028-29, Grimes $14.0M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).