Jordan Poole vs Quentin Grimes
Poole · Grimes
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveQuentin Grimes scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (13.4 vs 13.4), on Poole's heavier usage (23.5% vs 18.3%).
Grimes is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.5% to 53.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Grimes (3.3 vs 3.1 assists), the glass to Grimes (3.6 vs 2.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Grimes played 36 more games (75 vs 39 of 82).
With Grimes on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.1 per 100 possessions, against -7.9 for Poole; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Poole $34.0M through 2026-27, Grimes $14.0M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).