Derik Queen vs Nic Claxton
Queen · Claxton
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveNic Claxton scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (11.7 vs 11.7), on Queen's heavier usage (21.4% vs 17.5%).
Claxton is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.2% to 54.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Claxton (3.7 vs 3.7 assists), the glass to Queen (7.1 vs 6.9 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Queen played 12 more games (81 vs 69 of 82).
With Queen on the floor his team outscored opponents by -6.7 per 100 possessions, against -12.9 for Claxton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Queen $5.4M through 2028-29, Claxton $23.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
