Myles Turner vs Nic Claxton
Turner · Claxton
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveMyles Turner scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (11.9 vs 11.7), on Turner's heavier usage (18.1% vs 17.5%).
Efficiency is a wash: true shooting within a point of each other (58.4% vs 59.2%).
Playmaking goes to Claxton (3.7 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Claxton (6.9 vs 5.3 rebounds).
With Turner on the floor his team outscored opponents by -6.2 per 100 possessions, against -12.9 for Claxton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Turner $26.6M through 2028-29, Claxton $23.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

