Donovan Clingan vs Myles Turner
Clingan · Turner
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDonovan Clingan scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (12.1 vs 11.9), on Turner's heavier usage (18.1% vs 16.3%).
Clingan is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.4% to 58.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Clingan (2.1 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Clingan (11.6 vs 5.3 rebounds).
With Clingan on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.1 per 100 possessions, against -6.2 for Turner; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Clingan $7.5M through 2027-28, Turner $26.6M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Clingan | Turner | |
|---|---|---|
| 41-36 | Record when playing | 30-41 |
| 11.4 | Points at home | 11.9 |
| 12.9 | Points on the road | 11.9 |
| 13.4 | Points in wins | 11.3 |
| 10.6 | Points in losses | 12.3 |
| 28 | Season high | 31 |
| 0 | 30-point games | 1 |
| 37 | Double-doubles | 4 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).