Derik Queen vs Donovan Clingan
Queen · Clingan
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDonovan Clingan scored more in 2025-26, 0.4 points a game apart (12.1 vs 11.7), on Queen's heavier usage (21.4% vs 16.3%).
Clingan is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.4% to 54.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Queen (3.7 vs 2.1 assists), the glass to Clingan (11.6 vs 7.1 rebounds).
With Clingan on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.1 per 100 possessions, against -6.7 for Queen; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Queen $5.4M through 2028-29, Clingan $7.5M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Queen | Clingan | |
|---|---|---|
| 26-55 | Record when playing | 41-36 |
| 13.1 | Points at home | 11.4 |
| 10.4 | Points on the road | 12.9 |
| 11.0 | Points in wins | 13.4 |
| 12.0 | Points in losses | 10.6 |
| 33 | Season high | 28 |
| 3 | 30-point games | 0 |
| 14 | Double-doubles | 37 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

