Anfernee Simons vs Tre Jones
Simons · Jones
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveAnfernee Simons scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (14.3 vs 14.1), on Simons's heavier usage (22.7% vs 18.6%).
Jones is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.7% to 57.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Jones (5.4 vs 2.4 assists), the glass to Jones (3.1 vs 2.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Jones played 10 more games (65 vs 55 of 82).
With Simons on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.0 per 100 possessions, against -3.8 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Simons $6.0M through 2027-28, Jones $8.0M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).