Scoot Henderson vs Tre Jones

Scoot Henderson scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (14.2 vs 14.1), on Henderson's heavier usage (24.6% vs 18.6%).

Jones is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.7% to 55.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Jones (5.4 vs 3.7 assists), the glass to Jones (3.1 vs 2.7 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Jones played 35 more games (65 vs 30 of 82).

With Henderson on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.2 per 100 possessions, against -3.8 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Henderson $13.6M through 2026-27, Jones $8.0M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.