Cam Whitmore vs Corey Kispert
Whitmore · Kispert
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCorey Kispert scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (9.2 vs 9.2), on Whitmore's heavier usage (22.5% vs 17.9%).
Kispert is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.9% to 52.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Kispert (1.6 vs 0.7 assists), the glass to Whitmore (2.8 vs 2.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Kispert played 37 more games (58 vs 21 of 82).
With Kispert on the floor his team outscored opponents by -7.0 per 100 possessions, against -19.6 for Whitmore; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Whitmore — through —, Kispert $14.0M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).