Corey Kispert vs Sam Hauser
Kispert · Hauser
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveSam Hauser scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (9.2 vs 9.2), on Kispert's heavier usage (17.9% vs 14.1%).
Kispert is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.9% to 59.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Kispert (1.6 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Hauser (3.8 vs 2.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Hauser played 20 more games (78 vs 58 of 82).
With Hauser on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.8 per 100 possessions, against -7.0 for Kispert; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Kispert $14.0M through 2028-29, Hauser $10.8M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).