Carter Bryant vs Jarred Vanderbilt
Bryant · Vanderbilt
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJarred Vanderbilt scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (4.4 vs 4.2), on Bryant's heavier usage (15.8% vs 11.9%).
Vanderbilt is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.4% to 52.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Vanderbilt (1.3 vs 0.7 assists), the glass to Vanderbilt (4.5 vs 2.5 rebounds).
With Bryant on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.8 per 100 possessions, against +0.2 for Vanderbilt; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Bryant $5.1M through 2028-29, Vanderbilt $12.4M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

