Harrison Barnes vs Tristan da Silva
Barnes · da Silva
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTristan da Silva scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (9.9 vs 9.9), on da Silva's heavier usage (16.0% vs 14.4%).
Barnes is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.8% to 57.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Barnes (1.9 vs 1.6 assists), the glass to da Silva (3.7 vs 2.8 rebounds).
With Barnes on the floor his team outscored opponents by +7.8 per 100 possessions, against +1.6 for da Silva; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Barnes $8.0M through 2026-27, da Silva $4.0M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).