JD Davison vs Pat Connaughton
Davison · Connaughton
Where the gap is
from the numbers abovePat Connaughton scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (2.6 vs 2.5), on Davison's heavier usage (15.3% vs 15.0%).
Connaughton is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.6% to 47.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Davison (1.3 vs 0.4 assists), the glass to Connaughton (1.5 vs 1.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Connaughton played 14 more games (42 vs 28 of 82).
With Davison on the floor his team outscored opponents by +2.6 per 100 possessions, against -4.3 for Connaughton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Davison $2.6M through 2026-27, Connaughton $3.8M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

