Cam Christie vs Pat Connaughton

Cam Christie scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (2.8 vs 2.6), on Christie's heavier usage (16.8% vs 15.0%).

Connaughton is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.6% to 48.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Christie (0.6 vs 0.4 assists), the glass to Connaughton (1.5 vs 1.4 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Christie played 13 more games (55 vs 42 of 82).

With Christie on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.6 per 100 possessions, against -4.3 for Connaughton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Christie $2.3M through 2027-28, Connaughton $3.8M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.