Cam Christie vs Chaz Lanier

Cam Christie scored more in 2025-26, 0.4 points a game apart (2.8 vs 2.4), on Christie's heavier usage (16.8% vs 14.7%).

Christie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 48.4% to 43.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Christie (0.6 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Christie (1.4 vs 0.7 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Christie played 21 more games (55 vs 34 of 82).

With Lanier on the floor his team outscored opponents by +2.0 per 100 possessions, against -0.6 for Christie; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Christie — through —, Lanier $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.