Cam Christie vs Tyus Jones

Tyus Jones scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (3.0 vs 2.8), on Christie's heavier usage (16.8% vs 10.3%).

Christie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 48.4% to 44.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Jones (2.4 vs 0.6 assists), the glass to Christie (1.4 vs 1.1 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Jones played 12 more games (67 vs 55 of 82).

With Christie on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.6 per 100 possessions, against -6.1 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Christie $2.3M through 2027-28, Jones $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.