Nae'Qwan Tomlin vs Ryan Dunn
Tomlin · Dunn
Nae'Qwan Tomlin: Out (Back · Torso).
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveRyan Dunn scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (5.8 vs 5.8), on Tomlin's heavier usage (15.1% vs 13.6%).
Tomlin is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.9% to 53.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Dunn (1.5 vs 0.8 assists), the glass to Dunn (4.2 vs 2.9 rebounds).
With Tomlin on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.6 per 100 possessions, against +1.7 for Dunn; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Tomlin $2.4M through 2026-27, Dunn $2.8M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

