Anthony Gill vs Dean Wade
Gill · Wade
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDean Wade scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (5.8 vs 5.8), on Gill's heavier usage (11.6% vs 9.7%).
Gill is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 68.2% to 58.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Wade (1.5 vs 1.3 assists), the glass to Wade (4.2 vs 2.9 rebounds).
With Wade on the floor his team outscored opponents by +6.2 per 100 possessions, against -14.4 for Gill; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Gill — through —, Wade $9.0M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

