Bennedict Mathurin vs Trae Young
Mathurin · Young
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTrae Young scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (17.9 vs 17.6), on Young's heavier usage (26.2% vs 24.6%).
Young is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.2% to 57.5%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Young (8.0 vs 2.4 assists), the glass to Mathurin (5.4 vs 2.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Mathurin played 39 more games (54 vs 15 of 82).
With Mathurin on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.9 per 100 possessions, against -8.1 for Young; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Mathurin $7.8M through 2027-28, Young $49.5M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
