Bryce McGowens vs LJ Cryer
McGowens · Cryer
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveLJ Cryer scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.2 vs 8.1), on Cryer's heavier usage (19.6% vs 13.6%).
McGowens is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.0% to 59.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McGowens (1.5 vs 1.0 assists), the glass to McGowens (2.1 vs 1.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: McGowens played 24 more games (42 vs 18 of 82).
With Cryer on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.4 per 100 possessions, against -3.6 for McGowens; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McGowens $2.6M through 2027-28, Cryer — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).