Clint Capela vs DeAndre Jordan
Capela · Jordan
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDeAndre Jordan scored more in 2025-26, 0.6 points a game apart (4.4 vs 3.8), on Capela's heavier usage (13.3% vs 9.8%).
Jordan is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 67.1% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Jordan (0.9 vs 0.7 assists), the glass to Jordan (6.3 vs 4.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Capela played 63 more games (75 vs 12 of 82).
With Capela on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.0 per 100 possessions, against -2.4 for Jordan; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Capela $7.0M through 2027-28, Jordan $3.9M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).