Clint Capela vs Tony Bradley
Capela · Bradley
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTony Bradley scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (4.0 vs 3.8), on Bradley's heavier usage (13.6% vs 13.3%).
Bradley is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.6% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Capela (0.7 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Capela (4.6 vs 2.8 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Capela played 34 more games (75 vs 41 of 82).
With Capela on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.0 per 100 possessions, against -14.2 for Bradley; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Capela $7.0M through 2027-28, Bradley — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).