Dyson Daniels vs Miles McBride
Daniels · McBride
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveMiles McBride scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (12.0 vs 11.9), on McBride's heavier usage (17.4% vs 15.7%).
McBride is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.8% to 54.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Daniels (5.9 vs 2.6 assists), the glass to Daniels (6.8 vs 2.4 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Daniels played 35 more games (76 vs 41 of 82).
With McBride on the floor his team outscored opponents by +9.5 per 100 possessions, against +6.2 for Daniels; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Daniels $25.0M through 2029-30, McBride $4.0M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

