Elijah Harkless vs Jamal Shead
Harkless · Shead
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveElijah Harkless scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (6.8 vs 6.6), on Harkless's heavier usage (16.2% vs 14.9%).
Shead is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 49.1% to 47.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Shead (5.4 vs 2.9 assists), the glass to Harkless (2.0 vs 1.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Shead played 56 more games (82 vs 26 of 82).
With Shead on the floor his team outscored opponents by +5.8 per 100 possessions, against -2.5 for Harkless; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Harkless — through —, Shead $2.3M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
