Immanuel Quickley vs VJ Edgecombe
Quickley · Edgecombe
Immanuel Quickley: Day-To-Day (Hamstring · Leg · Right).
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveImmanuel Quickley scored more in 2025-26, 0.4 points a game apart (16.4 vs 16.0), on Quickley's heavier usage (20.6% vs 19.6%).
Quickley is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.7% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Quickley (5.9 vs 4.2 assists), the glass to Edgecombe (5.6 vs 4.0 rebounds).
With Quickley on the floor his team outscored opponents by +2.9 per 100 possessions, against +0.9 for Edgecombe; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Quickley $32.5M through 2028-29, Edgecombe $11.7M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

