Isaac Jones vs Pacome Dadiet
Jones · Dadiet
Where the gap is
from the numbers abovePacome Dadiet scored more in 2025-26, 0.4 points a game apart (1.7 vs 1.3), on Dadiet's heavier usage (16.7% vs 11.9%).
Jones is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 51.4% to 45.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Dadiet (0.4 vs 0.1 assists), the glass to Dadiet (0.9 vs 0.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Dadiet played 22 more games (29 vs 7 of 82).
With Dadiet on the floor his team outscored opponents by -1.7 per 100 possessions, against -37.9 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Jones — through —, Dadiet $3.0M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).