Jaden McDaniels vs Kyshawn George
McDaniels · George
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveKyshawn George scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (14.8 vs 14.8), on George's heavier usage (22.2% vs 18.2%).
McDaniels is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.1% to 55.9%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to George (4.5 vs 2.7 assists), the glass to George (5.1 vs 4.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: McDaniels played 25 more games (73 vs 48 of 82).
With McDaniels on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.1 per 100 possessions, against -11.5 for George; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McDaniels $26.2M through 2028-29, George $3.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).