Josh Minott vs Taylor Hendricks
Minott · Hendricks
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTaylor Hendricks scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (7.4 vs 7.4), on Minott's heavier usage (16.2% vs 15.7%).
Minott is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 65.3% to 56.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Hendricks (0.9 vs 0.9 assists), the glass to Hendricks (3.7 vs 3.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Hendricks played 10 more games (59 vs 49 of 82).
With Minott on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.1 per 100 possessions, against -10.7 for Hendricks; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Minott $4.5M through 2027-28, Hendricks $7.8M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).