Keegan Murray vs P.J. Washington
Murray · Washington
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveP.J. Washington scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (14.2 vs 14.0), on Washington's heavier usage (19.4% vs 18.2%).
Washington is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 53.7% to 49.9%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Washington (1.8 vs 1.7 assists), the glass to Washington (7.0 vs 5.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Washington played 33 more games (56 vs 23 of 82).
With Washington on the floor his team outscored opponents by -7.3 per 100 possessions, against -10.7 for Murray; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Murray $24.1M through 2030-31, Washington $19.8M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

