Kentavious Caldwell-Pope vs Vit Krejci
Caldwell-Pope · Krejci
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveVit Krejci scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.5 vs 8.4), on Caldwell-Pope's heavier usage (17.3% vs 14.2%).
Krejci is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.9% to 53.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Caldwell-Pope (2.7 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Caldwell-Pope (2.5 vs 2.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Krejci played 14 more games (65 vs 51 of 82).
With Krejci on the floor his team outscored opponents by -1.1 per 100 possessions, against -4.5 for Caldwell-Pope; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Caldwell-Pope $17.7M through 2026-27, Krejci $2.7M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
