Kristaps Porziņģis vs OG Anunoby
Porziņģis · Anunoby
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveOG Anunoby scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (16.7 vs 16.7), on Porziņģis's heavier usage (26.5% vs 19.4%).
Anunoby is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 62.0% to 58.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Porziņģis (2.5 vs 2.2 assists), the glass to Anunoby (5.2 vs 5.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Anunoby played 35 more games (67 vs 32 of 82).
With Anunoby on the floor his team outscored opponents by +9.2 per 100 possessions, against +3.0 for Porziņģis; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Porziņģis $19.5M through 2027-28, Anunoby $42.5M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Porziņģis | Anunoby | |
|---|---|---|
| 13-19 | Record when playing | 45-22 |
| 17.3 | Points at home | 15.9 |
| 16.2 | Points on the road | 17.5 |
| 18.2 | Points in wins | 18.3 |
| 15.6 | Points in losses | 13.4 |
| 30 | Season high | 34 |
| 2 | 30-point games | 2 |
| 1 | Double-doubles | 5 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).