Baylor Scheierman vs Tyrese Proctor
Scheierman · Proctor
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveBaylor Scheierman scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (5.5 vs 5.4), on Proctor's heavier usage (21.4% vs 11.7%).
Scheierman is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.6% to 55.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Proctor (1.5 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Scheierman (3.5 vs 1.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Scheierman played 27 more games (77 vs 50 of 82).
With Scheierman on the floor his team outscored opponents by +7.3 per 100 possessions, against -0.3 for Proctor; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Scheierman $2.7M through 2027-28, Proctor $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

