Jordan Walsh vs Tyrese Proctor
Walsh · Proctor
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTyrese Proctor scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (5.4 vs 5.4), on Proctor's heavier usage (21.4% vs 11.4%).
Walsh is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 62.3% to 55.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Proctor (1.5 vs 0.8 assists), the glass to Walsh (4.0 vs 1.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Walsh played 18 more games (68 vs 50 of 82).
With Walsh on the floor his team outscored opponents by +5.1 per 100 possessions, against -0.3 for Proctor; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Walsh $2.4M through 2029-30, Proctor $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).