CJ McCollum vs DeMar DeRozan
McCollum · DeRozan
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCJ McCollum scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (18.7 vs 18.4), on McCollum's heavier usage (24.7% vs 22.2%).
DeRozan is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.4% to 56.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to DeRozan (4.1 vs 3.9 assists), the glass to McCollum (3.3 vs 2.9 rebounds).
With McCollum on the floor his team outscored opponents by +1.5 per 100 possessions, against -11.7 for DeRozan; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McCollum $21.0M through 2026-27, DeRozan — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

