CJ McCollum vs Kon Knueppel
McCollum · Knueppel
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCJ McCollum scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (18.7 vs 18.5), on McCollum's heavier usage (24.7% vs 21.6%).
Knueppel is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.3% to 56.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McCollum (3.9 vs 3.4 assists), the glass to Knueppel (5.3 vs 3.3 rebounds).
With Knueppel on the floor his team outscored opponents by +6.2 per 100 possessions, against +1.5 for McCollum; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McCollum $21.0M through 2026-27, Knueppel $10.5M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| McCollum | Knueppel | |
|---|---|---|
| 37-39 | Record when playing | 44-37 |
| 19.7 | Points at home | 16.8 |
| 17.6 | Points on the road | 20.1 |
| 19.5 | Points in wins | 18.2 |
| 18.0 | Points in losses | 18.8 |
| 46 | Season high | 34 |
| 4 | 30-point games | 5 |
| 0 | Double-doubles | 7 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).