Daniss Jenkins vs Landry Shamet
Jenkins · Shamet
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveLandry Shamet scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (9.3 vs 9.3), on Jenkins's heavier usage (20.9% vs 15.1%).
Shamet is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.8% to 52.5%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Jenkins (3.9 vs 1.4 assists), the glass to Jenkins (2.3 vs 1.8 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Jenkins played 21 more games (72 vs 51 of 82).
With Shamet on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.1 per 100 possessions, against +6.6 for Jenkins; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Jenkins $4.0M through 2026-27, Shamet $5.4M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).