GG Jackson vs Kyle Kuzma
Jackson · Kuzma
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveKyle Kuzma scored more in 2025-26, 0.5 points a game apart (13.0 vs 12.5), on Jackson's heavier usage (23.0% vs 21.2%).
Jackson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.1% to 58.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Kuzma (2.7 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Kuzma (4.5 vs 4.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Kuzma played 14 more games (69 vs 55 of 82).
With Jackson on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.5 per 100 possessions, against -6.6 for Kuzma; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Jackson — through —, Kuzma $20.3M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).