GG Jackson vs Jonathan Kuminga
Jackson · Kuminga
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveGG Jackson scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (12.5 vs 12.2), on Jackson's heavier usage (23.0% vs 22.6%).
Jackson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.1% to 55.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Kuminga (2.3 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Kuminga (5.6 vs 4.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Jackson played 19 more games (55 vs 36 of 82).
With Kuminga on the floor his team outscored opponents by +4.1 per 100 possessions, against -3.5 for Jackson; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Jackson — through —, Kuminga $6.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).