Isaac Jones vs Jae'Sean Tate
Jones · Tate
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJae'Sean Tate scored more in 2025-26, 1.5 points a game apart (2.8 vs 1.3), on Tate's heavier usage (13.1% vs 11.9%).
Tate is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 56.7% to 51.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Tate (0.5 vs 0.1 assists), the glass to Tate (1.6 vs 0.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Tate played 39 more games (46 vs 7 of 82).
With Tate on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.3 per 100 possessions, against -37.9 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Jones — through —, Tate $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).