Jae'Sean Tate vs Jamison Battle
Tate · Battle
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJamison Battle scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (3.1 vs 2.8), on Battle's heavier usage (13.5% vs 13.1%).
Battle is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.5% to 56.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Tate (0.5 vs 0.4 assists), the glass to Tate (1.6 vs 1.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Battle played 15 more games (61 vs 46 of 82).
With Battle on the floor his team outscored opponents by +6.7 per 100 possessions, against -3.3 for Tate; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Tate $2.4M through 2026-27, Battle $2.3M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

