Ja Morant vs Zach LaVine
Morant · LaVine
Ja Morant: Day-To-Day (Elbow · Arm · Left). Zach LaVine: Day-To-Day (Hand · Arm · Right).
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJa Morant scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (19.5 vs 19.2), on Morant's heavier usage (30.5% vs 23.4%).
LaVine is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.4% to 52.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Morant (8.1 vs 2.3 assists), the glass to Morant (3.3 vs 2.8 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: LaVine played 19 more games (39 vs 20 of 82).
With Morant on the floor his team outscored opponents by -4.4 per 100 possessions, against -12.6 for LaVine; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Morant $42.2M through 2027-28, LaVine $49.0M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Morant | LaVine | |
|---|---|---|
| 7-13 | Record when playing | 9-30 |
| 20.5 | Points at home | 17.8 |
| 17.6 | Points on the road | 20.4 |
| 22.3 | Points in wins | 22.7 |
| 17.9 | Points in losses | 18.1 |
| 40 | Season high | 42 |
| 2 | 30-point games | 8 |
| 8 | Double-doubles | 0 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).