CJ McCollum vs Zach LaVine
McCollum · LaVine
Zach LaVine: Day-To-Day (Hand · Arm · Right).
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveZach LaVine scored more in 2025-26, 0.5 points a game apart (19.2 vs 18.7), on McCollum's heavier usage (24.7% vs 23.4%).
LaVine is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.4% to 56.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McCollum (3.9 vs 2.3 assists), the glass to McCollum (3.3 vs 2.8 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: McCollum played 37 more games (76 vs 39 of 82).
With McCollum on the floor his team outscored opponents by +1.5 per 100 possessions, against -12.6 for LaVine; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McCollum $21.0M through 2026-27, LaVine $49.0M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| McCollum | LaVine | |
|---|---|---|
| 37-39 | Record when playing | 9-30 |
| 19.7 | Points at home | 17.8 |
| 17.6 | Points on the road | 20.4 |
| 19.5 | Points in wins | 22.7 |
| 18.0 | Points in losses | 18.1 |
| 46 | Season high | 42 |
| 4 | 30-point games | 8 |
| 0 | Double-doubles | 0 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).