Tristan da Silva vs Zaccharie Risacher
da Silva · Risacher
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTristan da Silva scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (9.9 vs 9.6), on Risacher's heavier usage (16.8% vs 16.0%).
da Silva is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.6% to 55.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to da Silva (1.6 vs 1.1 assists), the glass to Risacher (3.8 vs 3.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: da Silva played 10 more games (77 vs 67 of 82).
With da Silva on the floor his team outscored opponents by +1.6 per 100 possessions, against +0.2 for Risacher; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: da Silva $4.0M through 2027-28, Risacher $13.8M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).