Chris Manon vs Jordan McLaughlin

Jordan McLaughlin scored more in 2025-26, 1.2 points a game apart (2.0 vs 0.8), on McLaughlin's heavier usage (14.3% vs 8.1%).

McLaughlin is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.2% to 45.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to McLaughlin (0.9 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to Manon (1.1 vs 0.7 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: McLaughlin played 35 more games (44 vs 9 of 82).

With Manon on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.3 per 100 possessions, against -11.5 for McLaughlin; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Manon — through —, McLaughlin $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.