Brooks Barnhizer vs Jordan McLaughlin
Barnhizer · McLaughlin
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveBrooks Barnhizer scored more in 2026-27, 0.4 points a game apart (1.4 vs 1.0), on McLaughlin's heavier usage (14.4% vs 11.5%).
Barnhizer is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.9% to 21.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McLaughlin (1.2 vs 0.9 assists), the glass to Barnhizer (1.1 vs 0.8 rebounds).
With Barnhizer on the floor his team outscored opponents by -23.4 per 100 possessions, against -30.4 for McLaughlin; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Barnhizer — through —, McLaughlin $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2026-27 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2026-27 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
