Chris Youngblood vs Jordan McLaughlin
Youngblood · McLaughlin
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveChris Youngblood scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (2.1 vs 2.0), on Youngblood's heavier usage (16.2% vs 14.3%).
McLaughlin is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.2% to 52.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McLaughlin (0.9 vs 0.4 assists), the glass to Youngblood (0.8 vs 0.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: McLaughlin played 10 more games (44 vs 34 of 82).
With Youngblood on the floor his team outscored opponents by +2.3 per 100 possessions, against -11.5 for McLaughlin; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Youngblood — through —, McLaughlin $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).