Jase Richardson vs Josh Okogie

Josh Okogie scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (4.5 vs 4.4), on Richardson's heavier usage (16.2% vs 11.2%).

Richardson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.4% to 54.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Richardson (1.1 vs 0.9 assists), the glass to Okogie (2.6 vs 1.2 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Okogie played 24 more games (78 vs 54 of 82).

With Okogie on the floor his team outscored opponents by +5.6 per 100 possessions, against -0.8 for Richardson; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Richardson $3.1M through 2028-29, Okogie $6.0M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.